4.6 Article

Direct injection high efficiency nebulizer-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for analysis of petroleum samples

Journal

SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 397-413

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0584-8547(02)00261-6

Keywords

DIHEN; ICPMS; flow injection analysis; organic solvents; principal component analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct injection high efficiency nebulizer (DIHEN)-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) is investigated for analysis of petroleum samples dissolved in volatile organic solvents. To minimize solvent loading, the solution uptake rate is reduced to 10 mul/min, far less than the level (85 mul/min) commonly used for aqueous sample introduction with the DIHEN, and oxygen is added to the nebulizer gas flow and outer flow of the ICR Factorial design is applied to investigate the effect of nebulizer tip position within the torch and the nebulizer and intermediate gas flow rates on the precision and the net signal intensity of the elements tested for multielemental analysis. Cluster analysis and principal component analysis are performed to distinguish the behavior of different isotopes, oxide species and doubly charged ions. The best operating conditions at a solution uptake rate of 10 mul/min are: RF power = 1500 W, nebulizer gas flow rate = 0.10-0.12 l/min, intermediate gas flow rate = 1.5 l/min and DIHEN tip position = 3-4 trim below the top of the torch intermediate tube. Acceptable recoveries (100 +/- 10%) and good precision (less than 3% relative standard deviation) are obtained for trace elemental analysis in organic matrices (a certified gas oil sample and a custom-made certified reference material) using flow injection analysis. Because of high blank levels, detection limits are 1-3 orders of magnitude higher for organic sample introduction than those acquired for aqueous solutions. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available