4.5 Article

Deficits in reciprocal social behavior in male twins: Evidence for a genetically independent domain of psychopathology

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.CHI.0000046811.95464.21

Keywords

autism; pervasive developmental disorders; Social Responsiveness Scale; twins; genetic epidemiology

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD39663] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH52813] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Previous studies have demonstrated substantial genetic influences on many child psychiatric disorders, including autism. In this study the authors attempted to quantify the degree to which genetic influences on deficits in reciprocal social behavior (a defining feature of pervasive developmental disorders) are shared with genetic influences on other domains of behavior in children. Method: Child Behavior Checklists (CBCL) and Social Responsiveness Scales (SRS) were completed for an epidemiological sample of 219 pairs of male twins. The SRS (formerly known as the Social Reciprocity Scale) is a measure of social impairment that distinguishes children with autism spectrum disorders from those with other child psychiatric disorders. Results: Regression analysis indicated that CBCL syndromes account for 43% of the variance in SRS scores. Bivariate analyses revealed that SRS scores are affected, in part, by phenotypic influences from the CBCL Social Problem syndrome. Forty-four percent of the causal influences on SRS scores, however, are independent from those on CBCL syndromes and are genetic in nature (90% confidence interval: 0.38-0.49). Conclusion: These results support the existence of a continuous distribution of deficits in reciprocal social behavior in the population, which are substantially genetically independent from other domains of child psychopathology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available