Journal
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 379-387Publisher
PSYCHONOMIC SOC INC
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194569
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
To examine whether the motor inhibition of return (IOR) postulated by Taylor and Klein (1998,2000) generalizes to manual guided movements or is restricted to saccadic responses, the following three experiments were conducted. The first experiment combined peripheral cues (which generate IOR) with four types of manual responses made to central targets (central arrow indicating the response location). The responses were made on a touch-screen and were the equivalent of either a detection keypress, a choice keypress, a detection-guided pointing movement, or a choice-guided pointing movement. No IOR was found for any of the responses. The second experiment replicated the main result under eye fixation control. In Experiment 3, peripheral cues and peripheral targets were used, and IOR was present in all responses. Overall, these findings suggest that motor-based IOR is restricted to the oculomotor system. Implications for motor-based IOR and attention-based IOR are discussed.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available