4.4 Article

An 1800-year record of the spatial and temporal distribution of fire from the west coast of Vancouver Island, Canada

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 573-586

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/X02-196

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Charcoal records from lake sediments may show changes in fire frequency over thousands of years, but such records are ambiguous with regard to the actual locations of fires. Using a comparison of fire dates from an 1800-year lake sediment record from the west coast of Vancouver Island (British Columbia, Canada) and dates of last fire from 38 sites in the same watershed using tree-ring and soil-charcoal C-14 dates, we estimated the source area that contributes to charcoal peaks and determined the degree to which fires were biased to certain locations. Twenty-three charcoal peaks, likely corresponding with individual fire events, were objectively identified from the sediment record. Comparison of fire dates from charcoal peaks in the sediment record with fire dates from points near the lake suggests that the charcoal source area is within 500 m of the lake edge. Fire occurrence within this charcoal source area increased sharply at AD 1100 from ca. 50 to ca. 300 years between charcoal peaks, coeval with the first Little Ice Age cooling. Soil-charcoal radiocarbon dates revealed that 37% of the charcoal source area had not burned over the last 1800 years and that the 23 fires identified in the sediment record were restricted to south-facing slopes near the lake. This spatial pattern may result only if fire is >25 times more likely to occur on susceptible sites (south-facing slopes) than on less susceptible sites. This strong bias in fire location ensured the millennial-scale persistence of large areas of late-successional forest through past climatic periods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available