4.6 Article

Trends in drug overdose deaths in England and Wales 1993-98: methadone does not kill more people than heroin

Journal

ADDICTION
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages 419-425

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00294.x

Keywords

heroin; methadone; mortality; overdose

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims To test the hypothesis that methadone is responsible for a greater increase in overdose deaths than heroin, and causes proportionally more overdose deaths than heroin at weekends. Design and setting Multivariate analysis of 3 9 61 death certificates mentioning heroin, morphine and/or methadone held on the Office for National Statistics drug-related poisoning mortality database from 19 9 3 to 19 9 8 in England and Wales. Measurements Percentage increase in deaths by year by drug, odds ratio (OR) of dying at the weekend from methadone-related overdose compared to dying from heroin/morphine overdose. Findings From 1993 to 1998, annual opiate overdose deaths increased from 378 to 909. There was a 24.7%(95% confidence interval (CI) 22-28%) yearly increase in heroin deaths compared to 9.4% (9 5 % CI 6-13%) for methadone only. This difference was significant (P < 0.001 by test of interaction) after adjustment for sex, age group, polydrug use, area of residence and underlying cause of death. The largest number of deaths occurred on Saturday (6 7 3). The OR of death from methadone overdose on Saturday and Sunday was 1.48 (95% Cl 1.29-1.71) for methadone-only deaths compared to dying from heroin/ morphine at the weekend after adjustment for other covariates, but the OR was not significant (1.09, 95% Cl 0.95-1.25) if the weekend was defined as Friday and Saturday. Conclusions There was no evidence that the threefold increase in deaths over time was due to methadone. There was equivocal support only for the hypothesis that there was an excess of deaths from methadone at weekends. increased interventions to prevent overdose among injectors in England and Wales are long overdue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available