4.2 Article

Topiramate protects against glutamate- and kainate-induced neurotoxicity in primary neuronal-astroglial cultures

Journal

EPILEPSY RESEARCH
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 63-71

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0920-1211(03)00039-1

Keywords

topiramate; neuron; glutamate; kainate; viability; primary cultures

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Potential neuroprotective effects of the antiepileptic drug (AED) topiramate (TPM) were evaluated using primary neuronal-astroglial cultures or astroglial-enriched cultures from newborn rats exposed to excitotoxic concentrations of glutamate (Glu) or kainate. Neurons expressed functional Gin receptors of the NMDA and AMPA/kainate types as evaluated by immunocytochemistry and Ca2+ imaging. When Glu (10 mM) was added to 9-10-day cultures incubated with the fluorescent dye calcein/AM for 5 h, there was a marked cell loss in both culture types, but was more pronounced in the neuronal-astroglial cultures. When TPM (5-10 muM) was included in the medium together with Glu, the amount of surviving cells was significantly higher in the neuronal-astroglial cultures, but not in the astroglial-enriched cultures. Immuno-labeling of the cultures revealed an enhanced survival of MAP positive neuronal cells when TPM was included in the Glu containing medium. As TPM has a proven negative modulatory effect on kainate activated receptors, neuronal-astroglial cultures were further exposed to excitotoxic concentrations of kainate (100 muM) and analyzed immunohistochemically. Significantly more MAP positive neurons survived in the TPM containing medium and showed a morphology similar to untreated cells. Valproate and phenytoin were used as reference AEDs. In conclusion, our results demonstrate a protective effect of TPM upon neuronal cells in primary culture, exposed to excitotoxic levels of Glu or kainate. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available