4.6 Article

Depletion of neutrophils in IL-10-/- mice delays clearance of gastric Helicobacter infection and decreases the th1 immune response to Helicobacter

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 170, Issue 7, Pages 3782-3789

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.7.3782

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R29 CA76129] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gastric infection with Helicobacter induces a lymphocyte-rich mucosal inflammation that contains a minor population of neutrophilic granulocytes. The function of neutrophils in the local immune response to gastric Helicobacter infection remains unknown. To investigate this issue, we conducted experiments in neutrophil-depleted control wild-type (wt) and IL-10(-/-) mice infected with Helicobacter fells by gastric lavage. Infection of wt mice elicited a mild, focal gastritis and a Helicobacter-specific Th1 immune response. In wt mice Helicobacter colonization of the stomach was persistent and progressively increased during the 29 days of observation. Infection of IL-10(-/-) mice with H. fells elicited a severe chronic gastritis and a greatly enhanced Helicobacter-specific Th1 immune response, as compared with wt mice. After initial colonization, the IL-0(-/-) mice completely cleared Helicobacter from the stomach by day 8. The gastric inflammation in wt and IL-10(-/-) mice contained modest numbers of neutrophils. The intensity of gastric inflammation and the extent of Helicobacter colonization were similar in control and in neutrophil-depleted wt mice. In contrast, neutrophil depletion of Helicobacter-infected IL-10(-/-) mice decreased the severity of gastritis, modulated the Helicobacter-specific Th1 immune response, and delayed the clearance of bacteria from the stomach. These studies identify a role for neutrophils in the local and systemic immune response to gastric Helicobacter in IL-10(-/-) mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available