4.3 Article

Variants of developmental genes (TGFA, TGFB3, and MSX1) and their associations with orofacial clefts:: A case-parent triad analysis

Journal

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 230-239

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.10223

Keywords

birth defects; genetic-epidemiological study; linkage disequilibrium; case-parent triad design; log-linear model; gene-gene interaction

Funding

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE08559, DE11948] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We selected 262 case-parent triads from a population-based study of orofacial clefts in Norway, and examined variants of developmental genes TGFA, TGFB3, and MSX1 in the etiology of orofacial clefts. One hundred seventy-four triads of cleft lip cases (CL +/- P) and 88 triads of cleft palate only cases (CPO) were analyzed. There was little evidence for an association of any of these genes with CL +/- P. The strongest association was a 1.7-fold risk with two copies of the TGFB3-CA variant (95% CI=0.9-3.0). Among CPO cases, there was a 3-fold risk with two copies of the TGFA TaqI A2 allele, and no increase with one copy. Assuming this to be a recessive effect, we estimated a 3.2-fold risk among babies homozygous for the variant (95% CI=1.1-9.2). Furthermore, there was strong evidence of gene-gene interaction. While there was only a weak association of the MSX1-CA variant with CPO, the risk was 9.7-fold (95% CI=2.9-32i among children homozygous for both the MSXI-CA A4 allele and the TGFA A2 allele. No association of CPO with the TGFA variant was seen among the other MSX1-CA genotypes. In conclusion, no strong associations were found between CL +/- P and variants at these three genes. There was a possible recessive effect of the TGFA TaqI variant on the risk of CPO, with a 3-fold risk among children homozygous for the variant. The effect of this TGFA genotype was even stronger among children homozygous for the MSXI-CA A4 allele, raising the possibility of interaction between these two genes. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available