4.5 Article

Gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective phase II study

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 85-90

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5002(02)00526-3

Keywords

carboplatin; gemcitabine; NSCLC; chemotherapy; advanced or metastatic lung cancer; phase II study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The primary objective of this phase II study was to determine the tumor remission rates in previously untreated patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (stage IIIB and IV), after treatment with gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Secondary objectives of this study were to determine toxicity, median survival and progression free survival in the same patient population treated with gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Patients and methods: Chemonaive patients with histological or cytological diagnosis of stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and Karnofsky performance status greater than or equal to 60 received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin AUC 5.0 over 30 min on day 1 after the gemcitabine infusion. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles, or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Results: Of the 60 patients qualified for efficacy analysis, five achieved complete remissions, 15 partial remissions and 33 had stable disease, for an overall objective response rate (CR+PR) of 33.3% (95% CI, 21.7-46.7%). Four patients had progressive disease. The predominant toxicity was hematologic, with grade 3/4 leucopoenia being most common (35% patients). The median duration of response was 5 months, median time to progression was 6 months and median survival was 9 months with 80% of patients censored. Conclusion: Gemcitabine plus carboplatin is an effective and well tolerated treatment for advanced NSCLC. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available