4.7 Article

Stricture of the proximal esophagus in head and neck carcinoma patients after radiotherapy

Journal

CANCER
Volume 97, Issue 7, Pages 1693-1700

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11236

Keywords

nonneoplastic stricture; dose planning; dysphagia; tube-feeding; endoscopic dilation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. It is well recognized that many patients with head and neck carcinoma noma have problems with food intake and malnutrition. The objective of the current study was to determine the clinical pattern of patients with nonneoplastic stricture of the upper esophagus after radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma. METHODS. A retrospective chart study of 22 patients with stricture of the proximal esophagus diagnosed between 1993 and 1999 at Karolinska Hospital was performed. The dose volume histograms of the first 2 cm and 5 cm, respectively, of the proximal esophagus were calculated. RESULTS. Five of the patients (23%) had total obliteration. The first 2 cm of the esophagus received at least 60 grays (Gy) in > 80% of the volume. Radiation injury 2 was not reported to Occur at doses < 60 Gy. There was a correlation found between dysphagia during radiotherapy and the development of proximal esophageal stricture. Stricture was diagnosed 1-60 months (median, 6 months) after radiotherapy. In 18 patients, the stricture was treated with single or repeated endoscopic dilation. These treatments allowed a nearly normal diet in 78% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS. Stricture of the Upper esophagus is one deglutition disorder that is reported to occur after radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma. In the Current 5 study, the authors emphasize the importance of knowing the tolerance of the normal esophagus to irradiation as well as early diagnosis of stricture of the proximal esophagus because this condition may lead to physical and emotional distress. Cancer 2003;97:1693-700. (C) 2003 American Cancer Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available