4.5 Article

Differential regulation by ambient pH of putative virulence factor secretion by the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 359-366

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2003.tb01076.x

Keywords

Botrytis cinerea; laccase; polygalacturonase; aspartic acid protease; oxalic acid; pH

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea is capable of developing on a wide variety of host plants that differ greatly in their pH values and biochemical defences. To evaluate whether the pH of the host tissue can regulate the production of pathogenicity factors by this fungus, we examined the ability of two isolates of B. cinerea that originated from different plant species to secrete putative virulence elements on synthetic media buffered at pH 2.0 to pH 7.0. Even though differing in the intensity of their responses, both isolates reacted similarly to their ambient pH. The production of extracellular polysaccharides and oxalic acid was detectable above pH 4.0 and pH 5.0 respectively. Conversely, the production of aspartic acid proteases could only be seen between pH 3.0 and 4.0. Finally, the secretion of polygalacturonase and laccase activity was found to exhibit two maxima, one around pH 3.1 and one around pH 6.0. Thus, pathogenicity factor production was found to be minimal between pH 4.5 and 5.5 and a different set of factors was produced at pH 3.1 and 6.0, two values that were found to correspond respectively to the average host fruit and leaf pH. These results demonstrate that ambient pH differentially regulates the synthesis of pathogenicity factors by Botrytis and may act as a novel regulatory element to assist this fungus in tuning its virulence machinery to the composition of its host tissue. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. on behalf of the Federation of European Microbiological Societies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available