4.4 Article

Branchial and renal handling of urea in the gulf toadfish, Opsanus beta:: the effect of exogenous urea loading

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1095-6433(03)00010-2

Keywords

gills; gulf toadfish; kidney; Opsanus beta; transport kinetics; urea; urea infusion; urea transport protein (tUT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to determine whether the pulsatile facilitated diffusion transport mechanism (tUT) found in the gills of the gulf toadfish (Opsanus beta) and the active secretion transporter thought to be present in its kidney could be saturated when faced with elevated plasma urea concentrations. Toadfish were infused with four consecutive exogenous urea loads at a rate of 0, 150, 300 and 600 p,mol kg(-1) h(-1). Initial plasma and urine urea concentrations were 8.1+/-0.9 and 12.4+/-1.5 mmol l(-1), respectively, and steadily increased with increasing infused loads of urea to a maximum of 36.8+/-2.8 mmol l(-1) in the plasma and 39.8+/-6.5 mmol l(-1) in the urine. There was only a very weak relationship (r=0.17) between pulse size (measured as branchial excretion during pulsatile excretion of urea) and plasma urea concentration (slope=9.79 mumol-N kg(-1) per mmol-N l(-1); P<0.05) suggesting that the branchial excretion mechanism was already saturated at normal plasma urea concentrations. Urine flow rate (0.15+/-0.03 ml kg(-1) h(-1)) and glomerular filtration rate (0.025+/-0.004 ml kg(-1) h(-1)) remained constant throughout the experiment despite the increased volume load. Renal urea secretion rate maintained a strong linear relationship (r=0.84) to plasma urea levels (slope = 0.391 μmol-N kg(-1) h(-1) per mmol-N l(-1); P<0.001) with no observable transport maximum, suggesting that the renal secretory transport mechanism was not saturated even at plasma urea levels well above normal, in contrast to the branchial excretion mechanism. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available