4.5 Article

A filler-rod technique for controlling redox conditions in cold-seal pressure vessels

Journal

AMERICAN MINERALOGIST
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 701-707

Publisher

MINERALOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2138/am-2003-0424

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anew method has been developed to impose different redox conditions in high-temperature-pressure experiments in cold-seal pressure vessels, at 800 degreesC and 2000 bars. Experiments were conducted by loading a metallic filler rod into the autoclave together with H-2 sensor capsules, and pressuring the autoclave with H2O. Rod materials tested successfully were Co, Ti, and C (graphite). The oxidation of these rods produces H-2, but because of diffusive H2 loss through the walls of the autoclave, the system may not be buffered with respect to H-2. However, f(H2) quickly reaches a steady state value, and because fH2 is easily measured by the hydrogen sensor method, the effect of the filler rods on the intrinsic fo(2) of the autoclave can be quantified. In order to produce oxidized conditions, Ar was used as the pressure medium and metal oxides, contained in Al2O3 tubes, were employed. By using either Ar or H2O as a pressure medium, a logfo(2) range of NNO -3.9 to NNO +4.6 can be imposed by this method, where NNO is the logf(o2) value of the Ni-NiO buffer. The ability to conduct long-run-duration experiments at high temperature and high f(H2) conditions is not possible with the traditional double-capsule technique because the buffer assemblage is consumed too quickly. However, run durations of up to 4 weeks with constant f(H2) at reduced conditions have been conducted using the filler-rod technique. This technique has been shown to be an effective method in controlling redox conditions in cold-seal autoclaves, and thus can be applied to investigating redox-dependent reactions in a wide range of geochemical systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available