4.7 Article

Cartilage turnover assessed with a newly developed assay measuring collagen type II degradation products:: influence of age, sex, menopause, hormone replacement therapy, and body mass index

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages 332-336

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.62.4.332

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cartilage normally has a slow turnover but in arthritis increased metabolism results in degradation of the tissue. Objective: To assess cartilage turnover in a sample of the general population by an assay measuring cartilage derived urinary collagen type II (CTX-II) C-telopeptide degradation products. Methods: CTX-II concentrations were measured in urine samples from 615 healthy men and women aged 20-87 years, and the influence of age, sex, menopause, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and body mass index (BMI) was assessed. Results: CTX-II concentrations showed age dependent variations, with notable differences between men and women. Mean (SD) CTX-II concentration in postmenopausal women (220 (118) ng/mmol, n=25) was significantly higher than in an age matched group of premenopausal women (112 (79) ng/mmol, n=26, p<0.001). CTX-II concentration in women using HRT (118 (57) ng/mmol, n=50) was significantly lower than in an age and BMI matched group of women not receiving HRT (215 (99) ng/mmol, n=50, p<0.001). In subjects with a BMI greater than or equal to25 kg/m(2), CTX-II concentrations were significantly higher than in those with a BMI <25 kg/m(2) (185 (114) v 148 (91) ng/mmol, p<0.001). Conclusions: Cartilage turnover, as assessed by measuring urinary degradation products of CTX-II varies considerably with age, and significant differences between CTX-II levels in men and women as well as in pre- and postmenopausal women are found. Further studies are required to validate the marker for assessing cartilage degradation in arthritis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available