4.5 Article

Aortomyoplasty: Hemodynamics and comparison to the intraaortic balloon pump

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages 315-321

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4804(02)00039-2

Keywords

counterpulsation; aortomyoplasty; electrical stimulation; heart-assist device; heart failure; hemodynamics

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Aortomyoplasty (AMP), a procedure in which the latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) is wrapped around the aorta and stimulated during diastole, is a potential method of chronic counterpulsation. Counterpulsation by the intraaortic balloon pump (LABP) is a proven treatment for ischemic coronary syndrome and heart failure but cannot be used chronically. This study examined the long-term potential of a unique AMP configuration and compared its performance to the LABP. Materials and methods. AMP was done using a wringer configuration (AMP-W) in nine dogs. Six and 12 months later, acute hemodynamic augmentation was evaluated by measuring differences in mean diastolic aortic pressure (mDAP), peak left ventricular pressure (pLVP), and the endocardial viability ratio (EVR) between stimulated and unstimulated beats. Results. The diastolic augmentation obtained by AMP-W at 6 months and by AMP-W and LABP at 12 months was statistically significant. Additionally, the enhancements in EVR (16.1 +/- 4.3%), mDAP (8.6 +/- 2.5%), and pLVP (-1.8 +/- 1.0%) at 6 months were similar to those in EVR (19.1 +/- 5.2%), mDAP (13.1 +/- 3.6%), and pLVP (-0.8 +/- 1.3%) at 12 months. Most importantly, the augmentation obtained by AMP-W at 12 months was similar to that of the IABP: EVR (17.1 +/- 5.9%), mDAP (13.4 +/- 6.7%), and pLVP (-1.5 +/- 0.8%). Conclusions. AMP-W is a safe, robust procedure, capable of providing counterpulsation equivalent to the LABP, 12 months following surgery. The potential for AMP-W to offer chronic counterpulsation and to benefit the ischemic heart should be investigated further. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available