4.4 Article

Comparison of Aspergillus ear rot and aflatoxin contamination in grain of high-oil and normal-oil corn hybrids

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages 637-643

Publisher

INT ASSOC FOOD PROTECTION
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-66.4.637

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-oil corn (Zea mays L.) grain is a valuable component of feed for monogastric livestock. One method of increasing the concentration of oil in corn grain is the TopCross method. With TopCross, ears of a cytoplasmic male-sterile, normal-oil hybrid are pollinated by a male-fertile, high-oil synthetic hybrid. The concentration of oil in the resulting grain is increased because of xenia effects. Kernels of high-oil corn typically have a larger germ and a smaller endosperm than kernels of comparable normal hybrids. The growth of Aspergillus fiavus Link:Fr within germ tissue has been reported to be more extensive than that on the whole corn kernel; therefore, the severity of Aspergillus ear rot could be more extensive and aflatoxin concentrations could be higher in high-oil grain produced by TopCross than in grain with a lower concentration of oil. The objective of this study was to compare Aspergillus ear rot severity levels and aflatoxin concentrations in the grains of hybrids crossed with high-oil or-normal-oil pollinators. Fifteen hybrids were evaluated in 1998 and 1999 in Urbana, Ill. Primary ears were inoculated with A. flavus and evaluated for susceptibility to Aspergillus ear rot and aflatoxin production in grain. Concentrations of aflatoxin and oil in corn kernels were significantly higher for high-oil hybrids than for normal-oil hybrids; however, ear rot severity was unaffected by the type of pollinator. These results suggest that grain from high-oil hybrids is at greater risk for aflatoxin contamination during some growing seasons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available