4.8 Article

Ghrelin in chronic liver disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 447-454

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00438-5

Keywords

ghrelin; catabolism; liver cirrhosis; hepatocellular carcinoma; anorexia-cachexia syndrome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Ghrelin is a novel endogenous ligand for the growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor involved in energy metabolism, glucose homeostasis and food intake. We investigated the role of ghrelin and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), the mediator of the GH axis, in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD). Methods: Ghrelin and IGF-1 serum levels were determined in 105 CLD patients and 97 healthy controls and correlated with clinical and biochemical parameters. Results: Ghrelin was significantly elevated and IGF-1 reduced in CLD patients compared with healthy controls. IGF-1 serum levels inversely correlated with Child's classification. Ghrelin levels were significantly elevated in Child C cirrhosis patients independent of the aetiology of liver disease. Ghrelin levels did not correlate with liver function. In contrast, there was a correlation of ghrelin with clinical (gastrointestinal bleeding, ascites, encephalopathy) and biochemical (anaemia, inflammatory markers, hypoglycaemia, renal dysfunction) parameters. In a subgroup of patients with CLD and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we observed a strong inverse correlation between alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and ghrelin levels. Conclusions: Unlike IGF-1, ghrelin is not correlated with liver function, but increases in Child C cirrhosis and with complications of CLD. The inverse correlation with AFP in HCC patients requires further studies on the potential impact of ghrelin on the pathogenesis of anorexia-cachexia syndrome. (C) 2003 European Association for the Study of the liver. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available