4.6 Article

Perceived physical demands and reported musculoskeletal problems in registered nurses

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 270-275

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00639-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. PHS HHS [R01 0H03702] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Nursing is physically demanding, and nurses have higher rates of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) than most other occupational groups. The physical demands of nursing may lead some nurses to leave the profession, contributing to the shortage of registered nurses in many workplaces that is a major concern today. As a first step toward reducing MSDs and their consequences, this study was designed to examine the relationship between perceived physical demands and reported neck, shoulder, and back MSDs in nurses. Methods: Data were collected anonymously from 1163 randomly selected working nurses (74% response rate) using a cross-sectional survey. The 12-item survey scale (internal reliability coefficient=0.89), rated perceived physical demands such as force, awkward postures, and heavy lifting. Nurses with a presumed MSD case reported relevant past-year symptoms in the neck, shoulder, and/or back lasting greater than or equal to1 weeks, or at least monthly, with moderate or more pain, on average. Results: Moderate and high perceived physical demands were significantly associated with reported neck, shoulder, and back MSD cases, even after adjustments for demographic and lifestyle-related covariates. Adjusted odds ratios for highly demanding work (vs low) ranged from 4.98 to 6.13 depending on body site. When analyses were restricted to staff nurses only, the odds ranged from 9.05 to 11.99. Conclusions: Perceived physical demands are associated with reported MSD in registered nurses, and the association is stronger in staff nurses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available