4.7 Article

Particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and daily mortality in Chongqing, China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages 562-567

Publisher

US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.5664

Keywords

China; daily mortality; particulate matter; sulfur dioxide

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES-00002] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 1995, daily mortality in a district of Chongqing, China, was analyzed from January through December for associations with daily ambient sulfur dioxide and fine particles (airborne particles with diameters less than or equal to2.5 mum; PM2.5). The mean concentration of PM2.5 was 147 mug/m(3) (maximum, 666 mug/m(3)), and that of SO2 was 213 mug/m(3) (maximum, 571 mug/m(3)). On average, 9.6 persons died each day. We used a generalized additive model using robust Poisson regression to estimate the associations of mean daily SO2 and PM2.5 with daily mortality (on the same day and at lags up to 5 days) adjusted for trend, season, temperature, humidity, and day of the week. The relative risk of mortality associated with a 100 mug/m(3) increase in mean daily SO2 was highest on the second lag day [1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-1.09] and the third lag day (1.04; 95% CI, 0.99-1.08). The associations between daily mortality and mean daily PM2.5 were negative and statistically insignificant on all days. The relative risk of respiratory mortality on the second day after a 100 mug/m(3) increase in mean daily SO2 was 1.11 (95% CI, 1.02-1.22), and that for cardiovascular mortality was 1.10 (95% Cl, 1.02-1.20). The relative risk of cardiovascular mortality on the third day after a 100 mug/m(3) increase in mean daily SO2 was 1.20 (95% Cl, 1.11-1.30). The relative risks of mortality due to cancer and other causes were insignificant on both days. The estimated effects of mean daily SO2 on cardiovascular and respiratory mortality risk remained after controlling for PM2.5.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available