4.6 Article

Vascular patterns in glioblastoma influence clinical outcome and associate with variable expression of angiogenic proteins:: Evidence for distinct angiogenic subtypes

Journal

BRAIN PATHOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 133-143

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2003.tb00013.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

No data exist on angiogenic patterns and their prognostic impact in human glioblastoma. Such data are relevant for translation of antiangiogenic therapies into clinical applications. Using immunohistochemistry for CD34, we assessed vascular patterns in 114 primary glioblastomas. Vascular patterns comprised unevenly distributed glomeruloid/garland-like/clustered bizarre vascular formations and evenly distributed delicate capillary-like microvessels (classic vascular pattern). The combination of low content of bizarre vascular formations and prominent classic vascular pattern (n = 29) was an independent factor for longer survival (p = 0.006, Cox regression), as well as postoperative high Karnofsky performance status (p = 0.005). In patients with a prominent classic vascular pattern, there was no difference of MIB1 labeling index whereas microvessel density and apoptotic index (TUNEL) were significantly higher as compared to all other patients (p<0.05). In addition, diffuse expression of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1alpha and strong expression of vascular endothelial growth factor were more common (p<0.05, Chi-square test). FISH revealed loss of chromosomes 1 p and 19q only in 1/7 long-time survivors with classic pattern. We conclude that vascular patterns in primary glioblastoma influence clinical outcome and associate with variable expression of angiogenic proteins. Our findings denote for the first time distinct angiogenic sub-types of human glioblastoma which may prove relevant for anti-angiogenic therapy approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available