4.6 Article

Optimal schemes to detect the presence of insect species

Journal

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 476-487

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01516.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Survey protocols to detect the presence of particular species should be organized to make optimal use of available resources. Current protocols mostly deal with this problem intuitively, but the problem can also be addressed with mathematical modeling. To this aim, we used a model that describes the abundance of a single, discrete generation of adult insects. Furthermore, we assumed that year-to-year variation in timing of the flight period was attributable to variation in peak emergence only. We determined the spacing of a given number of survey days on a transect that minimized the chance of missing a species when it was actually present. This spacing was fixed to a Julian date and applied to all years. We also calculated the probability of detecting the species, which depends on the number of survey days. For most parameter values, 5 survey days sufficed to detect with high probability (greater than or equal to0.95) populations with an observable population size (total number of insects that can be observed in the transect over the entire flight period) exceeding 10. For observable population sizes under 10, achieving a detection probability of 0.95 may require many more than 5 survey days. As an example of the method, we constructed a survey-detection scheme for the Quino checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino), based on the limited information available about its flight period. For an observable population size over 11, this scheme had a detection probability of >0.95. We also provide detection schemes for species whose death rate and variation in emergence time within and between years can at present be characterized only as small, moderate, or large. These survey schemes should maximize species detection and reduce uncertainty about absence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available