Journal
ARTIFICIAL LIFE
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 5-28Publisher
MIT PRESS
DOI: 10.1162/ARTL_a_00094
Keywords
Minimal agency; normativity; viability; organicism; precariousness; normative field
Funding
- FP7 project eSMCs [IST-270212]
- Programa Nacional de Movilidad de Recursos Humanos del MEC-MICINN, Spain
- Subvencion General a Grupos de Investigacion del Sistema Universitario Vasco. Grupo Filosofia de la Biologia from Gobierno Vasco [IT 505-10]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Living agency is subject to a normative dimension (good-bad, adaptive-maladaptive) that is absent from other types of interaction. We review current and historical attempts to naturalize normativity from an organism-centered perspective, identifying two central problems and their solution: (1) How to define the topology of the viability space so as to include a sense of gradation that permits reversible failure, and (2) how to relate both the processes that establish norms and those that result in norm-following behavior. We present a minimal metabolic system that is coupled to a gradient-climbing chemotactic mechanism. Studying the relationship between metabolic dynamics and environmental resource conditions, we identify an emergent viable region and a precarious region where the system tends to die unless environmental conditions change. We introduce the concept of normative field as the change of environmental conditions required to bring the system back to its viable region. Norm-following, or normative action, is defined as the course of behavior whose effect is positively correlated with the normative field. We close with a discussion of the limitations and extensions of our model and some final reflections on the nature of norms and teleology in agency.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available