4.6 Article

Stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity in female rats is estrogen-dependent and involves tachykinin NK1 receptors

Journal

PAIN
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages 227-234

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00056-8

Keywords

sex steroid hormone; visceral pain; stress; rectal distension

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hormonal cycling may be related to a higher incidence of pain syndrome in female. As tachykinins are pivotal in stress-induced colonic dysfunction, we investigated whether ovarian steroids influence stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity to rectal distension (RD) in female rats and further, whether this influence involves NK1 receptors. Female Wistar rats, either intact or ovariectornized (OVX), were equipped for abdominal muscle electromyography and submitted to 2-h partial restraint stress (PRS) or sham-PRS. First, the effect of PRS was evaluated in intact rats. Second, abdominal response to RD was recorded in OVX rats treated with either, progesterone, 17beta-estradiol, 17beta-estradiol-plus-progesterone, or vehicle, in both basal and PRS conditions. Third, the NK1 receptor-antagonist, SR140333, was tested in PRS-intact and PRS-OVX rats under 17beta-estradiol or 17beta-estradiol-plus-progesterone treatment. PRS induced visceral hypersensitivity to RD and this effect was prevented by ovariectomy. OVX rats treated with 17beta-estradiol or 17beta-estradiol-plus-progesterone, but not progesterone alone, exhibited visceral hypersensitivity after PRS similar to that of intact rats. Both stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity in intact rats and the hormonally-restored visceral hyper-responsiveness of OVX rats were antagonized by SR140333. It is concluded, therefore, that stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity in female rats is estrogens-dependent and mediated through NK1 receptor activation. (C) 2002 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available