4.5 Article

Teaching as therapy: cross sectional and qualitative evaluation of patients' experiences of undergraduate psychiatry teaching in the community

Journal

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 326, Issue 7392, Pages 740-743

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7392.740

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To explore the impact of participating in undergraduate teaching in general practice for patients with common mental disorders. Design Questionnaire survey and qualitative in-depth interviews. Setting Community based undergraduate teaching programme for fourth year students at a London medical school doing a psychiatry attachment. Participants Questionnaire survey: all patients involved in the teaching programme over one academic year. In-depth interviews: 20 patients, 14 students, and 12 general practitioner tutors participating in the programme. Results The questionnaire showed high levels of satisfaction with teaching encounters for participating patients, which were corroborated in the interviews. Many patients and general practitioners reported specific therapeutic benefits for patients from contact with students, including raised self esteem and empowerment; the development of a coherent illness narrative; new insights into their problems; and a deeper, more balanced, and understanding doctor-patient relationship. For a few patients the teaching caused some distress, which may relate to a lack of insight into their condition or deficits in students' interviewing skills. Conclusions Participation in teaching can have additional positive therapeutic outcomes for selected patients with common mental disorders, although a small minority report negative effects. Testing in a larger sample is needed to determine the characteristics of patients in these two subgroups and establish whether these effects persist.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available