4.7 Article

Prostaglandin F2α stimulates growth of skeletal muscle cells via an NFATC2-dependent pathway

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 161, Issue 1, Pages 111-118

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200208085

Keywords

FP receptor; calcium; myonuclei; cell fusion; NSAIDS

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR047314, AR-48884, AR47314, R01 AR048884] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE-13040] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM008367, T32-GM08367] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Skeletal muscle growth requires multiple steps to form large multinucleated muscle cells. Molecules that stimulate muscle growth may be therapeutic for muscle loss associated with aging, injury, or disease. However, few factors are known to increase muscle cell size. We demonstrate that prostaglandin F-2alpha (PGF(2alpha)) as well as two analogues augment muscle cell size in vitro. This increased myotube size is not due to PGF(2alpha)-enhancing cell fusion that initially forms myotubes, but rather to PGF(2alpha) recruiting the fusion of cells with preexisting multinucleated cells. This growth is mediated through the PGF(2alpha) receptor (FP receptor). As the FP receptor can increase levels of intracellular calcium, the involvement of the calcium-regulated transcription factor nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) in mediating PGF(2alpha)-enhanced cell growth was examined. We show that NFAT is activated by PGF(2alpha), and the isoform NFATC2 is required for PGF(2alpha)-induced muscle cell growth and nuclear accretion, demonstrating the first intersection between prostaglandin receptor activation and NFAT signaling. Given this novel role for PGF(2alpha) in skeletal muscle cell growth, these studies raise caution that extended use of drugs that inhibit PG production, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, may be deleterious for muscle growth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available