4.7 Article

Learning multilingual named entity recognition from Wikipedia

Journal

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages 151-175

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2012.03.006

Keywords

Named entity recognition; Information extraction; Wikipedia; Semi-structured resources; Annotated corpora; Semi-supervised learning

Funding

  1. Computable News project at the Capital Markets CRC
  2. University of Sydney Honours Scholarship
  3. Vice-Chancellor's Research Scholarship
  4. Australian Postgraduate Award
  5. Capital Markets CRC PhD top-up scholarship
  6. Australian Research Council [DP0665973, DP1097291]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We automatically create enormous, free and multilingual silver-standard training annotations for named entity recognition (NER) by exploiting the text and structure of Wikipedia. Most NER systems rely on statistical models of annotated data to identify and classify names of people, locations and organisations in text. This dependence on expensive annotation is the knowledge bottleneck our work overcomes. We first classify each Wikipedia article into named entity (NE) types, training and evaluating on 7200 manually-labelled Wikipedia articles across nine languages. Our cross-lingual approach achieves up to 95% accuracy. We transform the links between articles into NE annotations by projecting the target article's classifications onto the anchor text. This approach yields reasonable annotations, but does not immediately compete with existing gold-standard data. By inferring additional links and heuristically tweaking the Wikipedia corpora, we better align our automatic annotations to gold standards. We annotate millions of words in nine languages, evaluating English, German, Spanish, Dutch and Russian Wikipedia-trained models against CONLL shared task data and other gold-standard corpora. Our approach outperforms other approaches to automatic NE annotation (Richman and Schone, 2008 [61], Mika et al., 2008 [46]) competes with gold-standard training when tested on an evaluation corpus from a different source; and performs 10% better than newswire-trained models on manually-annotated Wikipedia text. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available