4.7 Article

Thermal inactivation of Pediococcus sp in simulated apple cider during high-temperature short-time pasteurization

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages 25-31

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00264-7

Keywords

apple cider; Pediococcus sp.; Escherichia coli O157 : H7; high-temperature short-time pasteurization; @RISK (TM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prompted by concerns regarding outbreaks of food-borne illness which have occurred due to the consumption of commercial, nonpasteurized fruit juices contaminated with Escherichia coli O157:H7, the US Food and Drug Administration and Canadian Food Inspection Agency are considering several new safety standards to apply to fresh juices, including mandatory pasteurization of all apple cider. In support of these initiatives, a study was conducted to evaluate the pasteurization of simulated cider using a heat-resistant nonpathogenic test bacterium, Pediococcus sp. NRRL B-2354. Thermal inactivation of the Pediococcus sp. was determined using a pilot scale high-temperature short-time (HTST) pasteurizer with a plate heat exchanger. The cumulative lethal effect, or pasteurization effect (PE), was obtained by converting times at different temperatures in the various sections of the pasteurizer to the equivalent time at the reference temperature (72degreesC). PE was then related by a simple linear function to the log(10) of the percentage of viable counts with a power transformation of the PE values to improve linear fit. r(2) values for the four Pediococcus sp. trials varied from 0.921 to 0.981. Intertrial variation was incorporated into the model using @RISK(TM) simulation software. Output from simulations confirmed that treatment at 71degreesC for 16 s can ensure a 5-log reduction of Pediococcus sp. Crown Copyright (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available