4.7 Article

Structural characterization of carbonized briquette obtained from anthracite powder

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS
Volume 112, Issue -, Pages 290-297

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2015.01.009

Keywords

Anthracite; Pyrolysis; Carbonized briquette; Structural characteristics; Raman spectroscopy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51274147]
  2. National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2012BAA04B03]
  3. Shanxi Provincial Postgraduate Innovation program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structural characteristics of carbonized anthracite briquettes (CAB) obtained at different pyrolysis temperatures were studied by surface area measurements, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Raman spectroscopy. The results indicated that the pyrolysis of the anthracite briquette mainly included the following three processes: drying, decomposition and bonding-repolymerization. The total pore volumes and surface areas of the CAB reached maximum values at 500 degrees C and decreased at higher temperatures. The side chains were removed during pyrolysis, leaving the CAB enriched with polyaromatics. The original oriented anthracite crystallites were deposed, and the microcrystalline planar size L-a underwent a prominent decrease before 700 degrees C. When the pyrolysis temperature rose to 900 degrees C, the higher pyrolysis temperature and more open structure of the briquette promoted the repolymerization of free radicals, and the value of L-a increased from 9.03 to 14.60. The variation of L-a correlated well with the mechanical strength of the CAB. The major change in L-a in the bonding-repolymerization process revealed stronger interactions between the binder and the anthracite, which improved the quality of the CAB. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available