4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Enrollment of older patients in cancer treatment trials in Canada: Why is age a barrier?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages 1618-1623

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.044

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the enrollment of older patients (greater than or equal to 65 years) in Canadian cancer treatment trials and compare accrual of older patients in Canada and the United States. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the number of older patients enrolled in National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) treatment trials between 1993 and 1996 was performed. These rates were compared with the corresponding rates in the general population of patients who were greater than or equal to 65 years old and had cancer, obtained from Statistics Canada, and those published by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) in the United States. Results: Between 1993 and 1996, 4,174 patients were enrolled onto 69 NCIC CTG trials of 16 tumor types. Older patients accounted for 22% of trial enrollees, compared with 58% of the Canadian population with cancer. This discrepancy existed in all cancer types except for multiple myeloma. The percentages of older patients enrolled were also analyzed by study type: 15% in adjuvant trials, 25% in metastatic trials, 29% in investigational new drug trials, 24% in phase I trials, and 21% in supportive care trials. The overall proportion of older patients enrolled onto Canadian trials (22%) was slightly lower than that in SWOG trials (25%). Conclusion: Age remains a barrier for accrual onto cancer treatment trials, even when reimbursement is not an issue. Strategies to overcome this barrier, including the implementation of trials specifically tailored to patients aged greater than or equal to 65 years, are prudent in light of our aging population. J Clin Oncol 21:1618-1623. (C) 2003 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available