4.8 Article

Frequent hypermethylation of MLH1 promoter in normal endometrium of patients with endometrial cancers

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 22, Issue 15, Pages 2352-2360

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206365

Keywords

MLH1; methylation; promoter; endometrial cancer; microsatellite instability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Silencing of the MLH1 gene by promoter hypermethylation is the mechanism underlying the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype in endometrial cancers. However, the profile of CpG methylation in a wide range of MLH1 promoters in endometrial cancers and in the normal endometrium is largely unknown. The present study investigates the region 700 bp upstream of MLH1 covering 48 CpG sites using bisulfite sequencing. Methylation status was classified as full (over 80% of CpGs are methylated), partial (10-80%) or nonmethylation (less than 10%). Of 56 endometrioid endometrial cancers, 16 (29%) were fully methylated, 14 (25%) were partially methylated and 26 (46%) were not methylated. Analyses of MLH1 by immunohistochemical means and of MSI revealed that the degree, rather than region-specific methylation of CpG islands is critical for decreased MLH1 expression and the MSI phenotype. Among 12 patients with methylated cancers, five (42%) patients contained methylated promoters in their normal endometria with profiles similar to those of cancer lesions, and these were associated with the MSI phenotype. In contrast, only one of 31 (3%) normal endometria from patients without endometrial malignancies harbored methylated promoters. These findings suggest that hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter is frequent in the histologically normal endometrium adjacent to cancers, supporting the notion that hypermethylation of mismatch repair genes is the initial step that triggers various genetic events in endometrial carcinogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available