4.5 Article

Kidney ultrastructural lesions in dogs experimentally infected with Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy, 1856)

Journal

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
Volume 113, Issue 2, Pages 157-168

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4017(03)00020-7

Keywords

Dirofilaria immitis; canine heartworms; dirofilariasis; ultrastructural; kidneys

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kidneys of 16 beagles with experimentally induced heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) infections and 4 heartworm-naive dogs were studied by light and electron microscopy. The infections were induced either by subcutaneous injection of infective larvae or by the transplantation of adult parasites, and infection periods varied from 111 to 818 days and 365 to 923 days, respectively. One control group of heartworm-naive dogs and four groups of heartworm-infected dogs, which were divided according to the type and the length of infection, were used. In the infected dogs, thickening of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM), the presence of dense deposits in the GBM, and foot process effacement were the most frequent lesions observed. In some dogs, electron dense deposits were seen in the GBM and the mesangium and/or enlargement of the mesangial matrix could be characterized. The longer the infection period, the thicker the GBM and the more common the occurrence of foot process effacement. In general, these alterations were more evident in animals that had been infected for more than 1 year, had high microfilaremia, and had 14 or more parasites in the main pulmonary artery and its branches. The presence of dense deposits suggests that the pathogenesis of kidney disease in dirofilariasis is associated with deposits of immune complexes in the membrane. The finding of ultrastructural changes in dogs with early prepatent infections suggests that immature heartworms, as well as microfilariae and possibly adult worms, contribute to the glomerulonephropathy. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available