4.7 Article

Partial vacuum storage improves the longevity of primed sh-2 sweet corn seeds

Journal

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 99-111

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00206-6

Keywords

antioxidation; sweet corn; emergence; priming; partial vacuum storage; longevity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Priming offers an effective means to raise seed performance in fresh seeds of sweet corn (Zea mays L.) hybrid carrying mutated shrunken-2 (sh-2) genes. However, primed sh-2 seeds generally have poorer longevity than non-primed seeds. The effects and mechanisms of priming on sh-2 seed longevity remain unclear. This study evaluates the effects of partial vacuum storage on longevity and free radical processing systems of primed sh-2 seeds. Priming was achieved by mixing the seeds with moist vermiculite and incubation at 15 or 20 degreesC for 36 h, followed by air-drying to the original moisture level. Primed seeds were vacuum-packed and stored at 25 degreesC for up to 12 months. Priming improved seedling emergence, reduced lipid peroxidation and enhanced antioxidative systems prior to storage. The longevity of 20 degreesC-primed seeds was decreased considerably in comparison with non-primed seeds when they were stored under non-vacuum conditions for 12 months. In contrast, 15 degreesC-primed seeds showed higher viability and vigor than non-primed control seeds when they were stored under non-vacuum conditions. Partial vacuum storage proved useful in extending the longevity of 15 degreesC-primed seeds for up to 12 months. The improved longevity was related to the decreased free radicals-mediated peroxidative responses. Partial vacuum improved seed vigor (e.g., the emergence percentage, the shortened mean emergence time and the increased seedling growth) were related to the reduced free radical-mediated peroxidation. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available