3.9 Article

Encapsulation of Human Islets in Novel Inhomogeneous Alginate-Ca2+/Ba2+ Microbeads: In Vitro and In Vivo Function

Journal

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.1080/10731190802369755

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Christopher Foundation
  2. Efroymson Fund
  3. Wirtz Family
  4. College of Medicine at UIC
  5. NIH [1 U42 RR023245-01]
  6. JDRF [5-2006-398, 5-2006-424, 5-2007-773]
  7. Washington Square Health Foundation
  8. Health Care Foundation
  9. Norwegian Diabetes Association/Norwegian Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation
  10. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-51-033205]
  11. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [U42RR023245] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microencapsulation may allow for immunosuppression-free islet transplantation. Herein we investigated whether human islets can be shipped safely to a remote encapsulation core facility and maintain in vitro and in vivo functionality. In non-encapsulated islets before and encapsulated islets after shipment, viability was 88.39 +/- 2.5 and 87.5 +/- 2.7% (n = 6, p = 0.30). Stimulation index after static glucose incubation was 5.4 +/- 0.5 and 6.3 +/- 0.4 (n = 6, p = 0.18), respectively. After intraperitoneal transplantation, long-term normoglycemia was consistently achieved with 3,000, 5,000, and 10,000 IEQ encapsulated human islets. When transplanting 1,000 IEQ, mice returned to hyperglycemia after 30-55 (n = 4/7) and 160 days (n = 3/7). Transplanted mice showed human oral glucose tolerance with lower glucose levels than non-diabetic control mice. Capsules retrieved after transplantation were intact, with only minimal overgrowth. This study shows that human islets maintained the viability and in vitro function after encapsulation and the inhomogeneous alginate-Ca2+/Ba2+ microbeads allow for long-term in vivo human islet graft function, despite long-distance shipment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available