4.8 Article

Reverse structural and gap-junctional remodeling after prolonged atrial fibrillation in the goat

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 107, Issue 15, Pages 2051-2058

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000062689.04037.3F

Keywords

atrium; fibrillation; structure; gap junctions; remodeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-Prolonged atrial fibrillation (AF) results in electrical, structural, and gap-junctional remodeling. We examined the reversibility of the changes in (ultra) structure and gap junctions. Methods and Results-Four groups of goats were used: (1) sinus rhythm (SR), (2) 4 months' AF (4 mo AF), (3) 2 months' SR after 4 mo AF (2 mo post-AF), and (4) 4 months' SR after 4 mo AF (4 mo post-AF). Atria were characterized electrophysiologically, (ultra) structure was studied by light and electron microscopy, and structural and gap-junctional protein expression was studied by immunohistochemistry or Western blotting. The atrial effective refractory period had completely returned to normal values 2 mo post-AF. Induced AF episodes still lasted for minutes at 2 and 4 mo post-AF, compared with seconds in the SR group. Structural abnormalities were still present at 2 and 4 mo post-AF, although to a lesser extent. The increased atrial myocyte diameter was back to normal at 4 mo post-AF. The number of myocytes with severe myolysis had almost normalized 4 mo post-AF, whereas myocytes with mild myolysis remained significantly increased. Extracellular matrix area fraction after 4 mo AF was similar to SR. However, the extracellular matrix fraction per myocyte had increased after 4 mo AF and remained higher post-AF. Changes in expression of structural proteins were partially restored post-AF. The reduction of connexin 40 that was observed during AF was completely reversed at 4 mo post-AF. Conclusions-Recovery from structural remodeling after 4 mo AF is a slow process and is still incomplete 4 mo post-AF. Several months post-AF, the duration of AF episodes is still prolonged (minutes).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available