4.7 Article

Optimization and application of SPME for the gas chromatographic determination of endosulfan and its major metabolites in the ng L-1 range in aqueous solutions

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 376, Issue 1, Pages 61-68

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-003-1855-8

Keywords

solid-phase microextraction (SPME); gas chromatography; electron capture detection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study an analytical method was optimized for the determination of alpha-endosulfan, beta-endosulfan, endosulfan sulfate, endosulfan ether and endosulfan lactone in small volumes of environmental aqueous samples using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography-electron capture detection (GC-ECD). A 100 pm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) phase was used for the extraction. The limit of detection (LOD) for the analytes varied between 0.01 and 0.03 mug L-1 with a relative standard deviation of 3 to 11%. The influence of the ionic strength on the extraction efficiency was investigated for the individual compounds. alpha-Endosulfan, beta-endosulfan, endosulfan sulfate and endosulfan ether were extracted successfully without salt addition. The extraction efficiency of endosulfan lactone was improved with 30% NaCl content. A general decrease in extraction efficiency for alpha-endosulfan, beta-endosulfan, endosulfan sulfate and endosulfan ether with high NaCl content (20-30%) in the solution was observed due to glass surface adsorption. No effect of dissolved organic material (DOM) on the extraction efficiency was observed. The extraction coefficients changed between Log K=2.17 and 3.33. A sample from the Antarctic region was analyzed using the optimized GCECD/SPME method. To confirm the results obtained for the real sample a GC with a mass spectrometer (MS) was used. Endosulfan sulfate, the most toxic metabolite of endosulfan, was found in the sample at a concentration of 0.3 mug L-1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available