4.6 Article

Glutamine synthetase from the marine cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus spp.:: characterization, phylogeny and response to nutrient limitation

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 412-423

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00433.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The regulation of glutamine synthetase (EC 6.3.1.2) from Prochlorococcus was previously shown to exhibit unusual features: it is not upregulated by nitrogen starvation and it is not inactivated by darkness (El Alaoui et al. (2001) Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 2202-2207). These are probably caused by adaptations to oligotrophic environments, as confirmed in this work by the marked decrease in the enzymatic activity when cultures were subjected to iron or phosphorus starvation. In order to further understand the adaptive features of ammonium assimilation in this cyanobacterium, glutamine synthetase was purified from two Prochlorococcus strains: PCC 9511 (high-light adapted) and SS120 (low-light adapted). We obtained similar to 100-fold purified samples of glutamine synthetase electrophoretically homogeneous, with a yield of similar to 30%. The estimated molecular mass of the subunits was roughly the same for both strains: 48.3 kDa. The apparent K-m constants for the biosynthetic activity were 0.30 mM for ammonium, 1.29 mM for glutamate and 1.35 mM for ATP; the optimum pH was 8.0. Optimal temperature was surprisingly high (55degreesC). Phylogenetic analysis of glnA from three Prochlorococcus strains (MED4, MIT9313 and SS120) showed they group closely with marine Synechococcus isolates, in good agreement with other studies based on 16 S RNA sequences. All of our results suggest that the structure and kinetics of glutamine synthetase in Prochlorococcus have not been significantly modified during the evolution within the cyanobacterial radiation, in sharp contrast with its regulatory properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available