4.7 Article

Wolbachia pipientis growth kinetics and susceptibilities to 13 antibiotics determined by immunofluorescence staining and real-time PCR

Journal

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 1665-1671

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1665-1671.2003

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wolbachia spp. are strict intracellular bacteria that infect a wide range of arthropods and filarial nematodes. Filarial nematodes are important causes of human diseases. There is increasing evidence that Wolbachia spp. influence important functions in the biology of the hosts, specifically, infertility. Preliminary experiments with humans and animals have suggested that antibiotics with activity against Wolbachia may help to treat filariasis. In this study, we determined using a real-time quantitative PCR assay the growth kinetics of a strain of Wolbachia pipientis from a mosquito grown in Aa23 cells. The doubling time was estimated to be 14 h. We then determined the susceptibilities of this strain to 13 antibiotics by two methods: an immunofluorescent-antibody test and a real-time quantitative PCR assay. Both techniques gave similar results. Doxycycline and rifampin were the most effective compounds, with MICs of 0.125 and 0.06 to 0.125 mug/ml, respectively. Fluoroquinolones were less effective, with MICs of 2 to 4 mug/ml for ciprofloxacin, 2 mug/ml for ofloxacin, and 1 mug/ml for levofloxacin. beta-Lactams (penicillin G, amoxicillin, ceftriaxone) were not effective at concentrations up to 128 mug/ml. The MIC of erythromycin was >32 mug/ml, whereas that of telithromycin was 8 mug/ml. Other antibiotic compounds were bacteriostatic only at high concentrations, including gentamicin, co-trimoxazole, and thiamphenicol. The real-time PCR assay was a convenient and reliable technique for determination of the antibiotic susceptibilities of Wolbachia. It may help in the future to simplify antibiotic susceptibility testing of strict intracellular pathogens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available