3.9 Article

Kefir improves lactose digestion and tolerance in adults with lactose maldigestion

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages 582-587

Publisher

AMER DIETETIC ASSOC
DOI: 10.1053/jada.2003.50111

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Kefir is a fermented milk beverage that contains different cultures than yogurt. The objective of this study was to determine whether kefir improves lactose digestion and tolerance in adults with lactose maldigestion. Design Randomized block design. Subjects Fifteen healthy, free-living adults with lactose maldigestion. Main outcome measures Breath hydrogen excretion and lactose intolerance symptoms were monitored hourly for 8 hours after each test meal. Intervention Subjects were fed test meals consisting of 20 g lactose portions of milk (2% reduced fat), plain and raspberry flavored kefir, and plain and raspberry flavored yogurt, each following an overnight (12 hour) fast. Statistical analysis Mixed model ANOVA was performed on raw or transformed data, followed by Tukey HSD post hoc tests (when appropriate). Significance was defined as P<.05. Results The, breath hydrogen area under the curve (AUC) for milk (224 39 ppm . h) was significantly greater than for the plain yogurt (76+/-14 ppm . h, P<.001), the plain kefir (87 37 ppm . h, P<.001), and the flavored yogurt (76+/-14 ppm . h, P=.005). The flavored kefir had an intermediate response (156+/-26 ppm. . h). The yogurts and kefirs all similarly reduced the perceived severity of flatulence by 54% to 71% relative to milk. Abdominal pain and diarrhea symptoms were negligible among the five treatments. Applications/conclusions Because kefir improved lactose digestion and tolerance in this study, its use may be another potential strategy for overcoming lactose intolerance. Further studies of other types of kefir for improving lactose digestion are warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available