4.5 Article

Physical activity levels in children and adolescents

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 605-609

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802246

Keywords

PAL; doubly labeled water; activity-related energy expenditure; age-dependent; sex-dependent; activity-related energy expenditure per kilogram

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Reference data for physical activity level (PAL) and activity-related energy expenditure (AEE) are needed for a better understanding of the effect of activity on childhood health, growth and development OBJECTIVE: Data from 17 studies measuring TDEE (TDEE) with doubly labelled water DLW were combined to construct a reference line for PAL and AEE as a function of age. DESIGN: A total of 17 studies from the literature were analyzed; 17 on girls and 16 on boys. Children were aged 3-16 y and of Caucasian origin. Weighted least-squares regression was used to obtain reference lines for PAL and AEE as a function of age and gender. The relative numbers of children per study were used as a weighting factor. Basal metabolic rate (BMR) or nonfasted (NF) resting metabolic rate and sex were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Although there was no difference in PAL between boys and girls, a significant difference in AEE was found between the two sexes. PAL: 0.025 x age+1.40. AEE (MJ/day): boys 0.30 x age+0.025; girls 0.21 x age+0.33. If BMR is measured under NF conditions, the obtained value has to be reduced by 0.21 for PAL and 0.75 Mj/day for AEE. No relation was found between AEE/kg and age. CONCLUSIONS: PAL and AEE were found to increase with age, showing the importance of age-dependent recommendations. Recommendations for AEE need to be differentiated for sex. To compare PAL and AEE between studies, the measurement conditions of BMR have to be taken into account. The increase in PAL and AEE values can be attributed to an increase in weight, because there was no relation between AEE/kg and age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available