4.6 Article

Role of nitric oxide in cerebral blood flow abnormalities after traumatic brain injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 582-588

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000059586.71206.F3

Keywords

nitric oxide; cerebral blood flow; brain injury; intracerebral microdialysis

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [P01 NS38660] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitric oxide (NO) has important regulatory functions within the central nervous system. NO is oxidized in vivo to nitrate and nitrite (NOx). Measurement of these products gives an index of NO production. The purpose of this study was to examine the relation between the brain extracellular concentration of NO metabolites and cerebral blood flow (CBF) after severe traumatic brain injury. Using a chemiluminescence method, NOx concentrations were measured in 6,701 microdialysate samples obtained from 60 patients during the first 5 d after severe head injury. Regional and global values of CBF obtained by xenon-enhanced computed tomography were used for analyses. Dialysate NOx values were the highest within the first 24 h after brain trauma and gradually decreased over the 5 postinjury d (time effect, P < 0.001). Mean dialysate concentration of NOx was 15.5 +/- 17.6 mumol/L (minimum 0.3, maximum 461 mumol/L) and 65% of samples were between 5 and 20 mumol/L. There was a significant relation between regional CBF and dialysate NOx levels (r(2) = 0.316, P < 0.001). Dialysate NOx levels (9.5 +/- 2.2 mumol/L) in patients with critical reduction of regional CBF (<18 mL (.) 100 g(-1) (.) min(-1)) were significantly lower than in patients with normal CBF (18.6 +/- 8.1 mumol/L; P < 0.001). This relation between the dialysate concentration of NOx and regional CBF suggests some role for NO in the abnormalities of CBF that occur after traumatic brain injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available