4.7 Article

Microsatellite variability in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]: cultivar identification, marker mutation, pedigree inferences and population structure

Journal

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS
Volume 106, Issue 8, Pages 1341-1352

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-002-1128-5

Keywords

Simple sequence repeats; SSRs; Variability; Molecular markers; Breeder's rights

Funding

  1. INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria) [SC97-097, RTAO1-118-C2-2]
  2. Catalan Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A collection of 212 peach and nectarine cultivars covering a wide variation of the species were studied with 16 polymorphic single-locus microsatellite, or simple-sequence repeat (SSR), markers. The average number of alleles per locus was 7.3, 35% of the cultivar x locus combinations analyzed were heterozygous and 87% of the cultivars studied could be individually identified. Most of the groups where two or more cultivars had the same SSR fingerprint included known peach mutants or possible synonymies. Pedigree information was tested with the SSR data. Five unexpected genotypes, due to a mutation at five SSR loci were found when comparing the SSR fingerprint of 14 known mutant cultivars and putative synonymous cultivars. The pedigree data were not consistent with the observed data in 11 out of 38 cases that could be analyzed. The group of non-melting fruit flesh cultivars, generally used by the canning industry, was more variable and genetically distant than the rest of the cultivars tested. Based on their level of homozygosity it was possible to separate those cultivars that were obtained by modern breeding technologies from those that were selected from traditional orchards after generations of seed propagation. The former had a distribution of genotypic frequencies close to a random mating model while the latter had a higher level of homozygosity. The implications of these data for the use of SSR fingerprints in breeder's rights protection and peach breeding are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available