4.7 Article

EBSD study of a hot deformed nickel-based superalloy

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 640, Issue -, Pages 101-113

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.008

Keywords

Hot deformation; Grain boundaries; Dynamic recrystallization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51375502]
  2. 973 Program [2013CB035801]
  3. Key Laboratory of Efficient & Clean Energy Utilization, College of Hunan Province, China [2015NGQ001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hot deformation behaviors of a typical nickel-based superalloy are investigated by isothermal compression tests under the deformation temperature range of 920-1040 degrees C and strain rate range of 0.001-1 s(-1). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) technique and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) are employed to study the evolution of hot deformed microstructures. It is found that the fraction of low angle grain boundaries decreases with the increase of deformation temperature or the decrease of strain rate. This is related to the decrease of dynamic recrystallization degree under the low deformation temperature or high strain rate. The fraction of low angle grain boundaries shows a rapid increase at the relatively small deformation degree, and then a significant decrease due to the progress of dynamic recrystallization (DRX). The microstructural changes indicate that both continuous dynamic recrystallization (CDRX) and discontinuous dynamic recrystallization (DDRX) take place during hot deformation. However, the small fraction of low angle boundaries with 10-15 degrees misorientation indicates that the CDRX plays a minor role on the nucleation of dynamic recrystallization. Discontinuous dynamic recrystallization (DDRX) characterized by grain boundary bulging is the dominant nucleation mechanism for the studied superalloy. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available