Journal
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 274-277Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00321-2
Keywords
-
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Several aspects of the management of displaced supracondylar fractures in children remain controversial. Displaced supracondylar humeral fractures (Type III) in children have traditionally been considered orthopaedic emergencies. Recent studies have suggested that closed Type III supracondylar fractures without vascular compromise may be treated in a delayed manner without compromise. to functional and cosmetic outcome. Debate continues over the fixation method of choice in these difficult fractures. A postal questionnaire of 121 practising paediatric orthopaedic consultants in the UK was performed to explore these issues. Seventy-seven replies were obtained (63.6%). The 54.5% of the respondents managed displaced supracondylar fractures without vascular compromise in a delayed manner (more than 8 h from presentation). The incidence, initial assessment and factors which influence the timing of surgery of these fractures are discussed. The fixation method of choice reported was closed reduction and the use of smooth Kirshner wires (93.4%). Of these, crossed pin fixation is used by 83.9% of respondents and 9.7% employed laterally placed wires. The majority of consultants (69.7%) considered the operative treatment of these fractures a consultant-led procedure. This survey has established an overview of the current practices of paediatric orthopaedic consultants in the UK in the management of these difficult fractures. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available