3.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Low use of rural maternity services in Uganda: Impact of women's status, traditional beliefs and limited resources

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages 16-26

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(03)02176-1

Keywords

maternal mortality and morbidity; maternity services; traditional birth attendants; women's status; beliefs/norms/values; Uganda

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Uganda, lock of resources and skilled staff to improve quality and delivery of maternity services, despite good policies and concerted efforts, have not yielded an increase in utilisation of those services by women or a reduction in the high ratio of maternal deaths. This paper reports a study conducted from November 2000 to October 2001 in Hoima, a rural district in western Uganda, whose aim was to enhance understanding of why, when faced with complications of pregnancy or delivery, women continue to choose high risk options leading to severe morbidity and even their own deaths. The findings demonstrate that adherence to traditional birthing practices and beliefs that pregnancy is a test of endurance and maternal death a sad but normal event, are important factors. The use of primary health units and the referral hospital, including when complications occur, was considered only as a lost resort. Lack of skilled staff at primary health care level, complaints of abuse, neglect and poor treatment in hospital and poorly understood reasons for procedures, plus health workers' views that women were ignorant, also explain the unwillingness of women to deliver in health facilities and seek care for complications. Appropriate interventions are needed to address the barriers between rural mothers and the formal health care system, including community education on all aspects of essential obstetric care and sensitisation of service providers to the situation of rural mothers. (C) 2003 Reproductive Health Matters. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available