4.2 Article

Factors that influence nurses' job satisfaction

Journal

JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages 293-299

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005110-200305000-00005

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine factors affecting the job satisfaction of registered nurses (RNs). Background: A growing recognition of job dissatisfaction among RNs in South Carolina hospitals has contributed to current problems with recruitment and retention. If administrators identify factors influencing RNs job satisfaction in hospitals and implement strategies to address these factors, RN turnover rates will decrease and recruiting and retention rates will increase. Methods: A cross-sectional study of secondary data was designed to identify the individual, work, and geographic factors that impact nursing job satisfaction at the state level. A 27-question self-administered survey was sent to 17,500 RNs in South Carolina with postage-paid envelopes for their responses. Surveys from 3472 nurses were completed anonymously. Univariate statistics were used to-describe the study sample. One-way and multivariable Analysis of Variance were used to determine which variables contributed the most to job satisfaction. Results: For about two thirds of the RNs, job satisfaction remained the same or had lessened over the past 2 years. In addition, statistically significant differences were found between job satisfaction and years of service, job position, hospital retirement plan, and geographic area. Conclusions: The findings have implications for nurse managers and hospital administrators for planning and implementing effective health policies that will meet the unique needs of their staffs and organizations. Such research is particularly relevant in this difficult time of nursing shortages throughout the healthcare industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available