4.5 Article

Long CTG tracts from the myotonic dystrophy gene induce deletions and rearrangements during recombination at the APRT locus in CHO cells

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages 3152-3162

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.9.3152-3162.2003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES011347, ES11347] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM38219, GM52982, R01 GM038219] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS37554] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Expansion of CTG triplet repeats in the 3' untranslated region of the DMPK gene causes the autosomal dominant disorder myotonic dystrophy. Instability of CTG repeats is thought to arise from their capacity to form hairpin DNA structures. How these structures interact with various aspects of DNA metabolism has been studied intensely for Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae but is relatively uncharacterized in mammalian cells. To examine the stability of (CTG)(17), (CTG)(98), and (CTG)(183) repeats during homologous recombination, we placed them in the second intron of one copy of a tandemly duplicated pair of APRT genes. Cells selected for homologous recombination between the two copies of the APRT gene displayed distinctive patterns of change. Among recombinants from cells with (CTG)(98) and (CTG)(183), 5% had lost large numbers of repeats and 10% had suffered rearrangements, a frequency more than 50-fold above normal levels. Analysis of individual rearrangements confirmed the involvement of the CTG repeats. Similar changes were not observed in proliferating (CTG)(98) and (CTG)(183) cells that were not recombinant at APRT. Instead, they displayed high frequencies of small changes in repeat number. The (CTG)(17) repeats were stable in all assays. These studies indicate that homologous recombination strongly destabilizes long tracts of CTG repeats.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available