4.7 Article

Genomic bindin by the Drosophila Myc, Max, Mad/Mnt transcription factor network

Journal

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages 1101-1114

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.1066903

Keywords

myc; mad; Drosophila; target genes; transcription

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA057138, CA80295-03S, P30 CA015704, R01CA57138, P30 CA15704-29] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM47852, R01 GM051186, R01 GM51186] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NLM NIH HHS [1P20LM007276-01, P20 LM007276] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Myc/Max/Mad transcription factor network is critically involved in cell behavior; however, there is relatively little information on its genomic binding sites. We have employed the DamID method to carry out global genomic mapping of the Drosophila Myc, Max, and Mad/Mnt proteins. Each protein was tethered to Escherichia coli DNA adenine-methyltransferase (Dam) permitting methylation proximal to in vivo binding sites in Kc cells. Microarray analyses of methylated DNA fragments reveals binding to multiple loci on all major Drosophila chromosomes. This approach also reveals dynamic interactions among network members as we find that increased levels of dMax influence the extent of dMyc, but not dMnt, binding. Computer analysis using the REDUCE algorithm demonstrates that binding regions correlate with the presence of E-boxes, CG repeats, and other sequence motifs. The surprisingly large number of directly bound loci (-15% of coding regions) suggests that the network interacts widely with the genome. Furthermore, we employ microarray expression analysis to demonstrate that hundreds of DamID-binding loci correspond to genes whose expression is directly regulated by dMyc in larvae. These results suggest that a fundamental aspect of Max network function involves widespread binding and regulation of gene expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available