4.4 Article

Advanced glycation endproducts in human diabetic and non-diabetic cataractous lenses

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-002-0616-2

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Advanced glycation endproduct (AGE) formation is thought to contribute to aging and cataract formation in the lens. In this study, we evaluated AGE immunoreactivity in human diabetic (n=14) and nondiabetic (n=31) cataractous lenses in relation to high-molecular-weight (HMW) protein content, which is believed to contribute to the onset of cataract. Methods: AGE immunoreactivity was detected in alkali-soluble individual lens samples. Competitive ELISA with polyclonal anti-AGE antibody was performed to estimate AGEs. SDS-PAGE was used to detect changes in lens protein composition on the basis of molecular size. Results: Regression analysis of data from nondiabetic lenses showed a significant correlation between lens AGE content and patient age (r=0.665, P<0.001). The curve exhibited exponential regression (y=0.272.e(0.025x)). The level of nonspecified AGEs measured in diabetic lenses showed an overall increase compared with nondiabetic lenses (4.03+/-1.85 vs 1.78+/-0.71 AU/mg protein, P<0.0078). SDS-PAGE showed the occurrence of HMW proteins in both diabetic and nondiabetic lens samples. However, in diabetic patients, who had a higher level of AGEs, a significantly higher proportion of HMW proteins was also observed. The levels of AGE and percent of HMW aggregates showed a very significant correlation (r=0.68, P<0.007) in the diabetic group, whereas in nondiabetics the correlation, although positive, did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: The AGE distribution, with a higher proportion in the samples of lenses rich in HMW aggregates, corroborates the hypothesis that the advanced glycation process might have a role in degenerative changes in eye lens, which in diabetic patients occur vigorously and much earlier than in those without diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available