4.8 Article

A directional strategy for monitoring Cre-mediated recombination at the cellular level in the mouse

Journal

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 562-565

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nbt811

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Functional redundancies, compensatory mechanisms, and lethal phenotypes often prevent the full analysis of gene functions through generation of germline null mutations in the mouse(1). The use of site-specific recombinases, such as Cre, which catalyzes recombination between loxP sites(2), has allowed the engineering of mice harboring targeted somatic mutations, which are both temporally controlled and cell-type restricted(1,3). Many Cre-expressing mouse lines exist, but only a few transgenic lines are available that harbor a reporter gene whose expression is dependent on a Cre-mediated event(3). Moreover, their use to monitor gene ablation at the level of individual cells is often limited, as in some tissues the reporter gene may be silenced(1), be affected by position-effect variegation(4), or reside in a chromatin configuration inaccessible for recombinations. Thus, one cannot validly extrapolate from the expression of a reporter transgene to an identical ablation pattern for the conditional allele of a given gene. By combining the ability of Cre recombinase to invert or excise a DNA fragment, depending on the orientation of the flanking loxP sites(6), and the availability of both wild-type (WT) and mutant loxP sites(7), we designed a Cre-dependent genetic switch (FLEx switch) through which the expression of a given gene is turned off, while the expression of another one is concomitantly turned on. We demonstrate the efficiency and reliability of this switch to readily detect, in the mouse, at the single cell level, Cre-mediated gene ablation. We discuss how this strategy can be used to generate genetic modifications in a conditional manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available