4.5 Article

Temporal and spatial variation in stocks of autotrophic and heterotrophic microbes in the upper water column of the central Arctic Ocean

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0967-0637(03)00031-1

Keywords

microplankton; phytoplankton; bacteria; protists; flagellates; biomass; Arctic Ocean; Canada Basin

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As part of the SHEBA/JOIS drift experiment, we continually analysed abundance and biomass of autotrophic and heterotrophic microbes in the upper 120 in of the water column of the ice-covered Central Arctic Ocean from November 1997 through August 1998. Microbial biomass was concentrated in the upper 60 in of the water column. There were low but persistent stocks of heterotrophic and autotrophic microbes during the winter months. Phytoplankton biomass began increasing when winter snow melted from the ice-pack in early June, after which there was a progressive decline of nitrate and silicate in the euphotic zone. We observed three distinct blooms over the summer. The initial bloom consisted of diatoms and phytoflagellates, mainly 2 mum-sized Micromonas sp.; the two subsequent blooms were dominated by the flagellated (non-colonial) Phaeocystis sp. The carbon:chlorophyll ratio of the phytoplankton was 31 +/- 11. Stocks of bacteria and heterotrophic protists approximately doubled during the growing season, increasing in tandem with increase in phytoplankton biomass. Increase in cell abundances of bacteria and of the phytoflagellate Micromonas over 40-50 d periods during the initial bloom period yielded estimates of realised growth rate of 0.025 d(-1) for bacteria and of 0.11 d(-1) for Micromonas. Fleterotrophic, protists included flagellates, ciliates, and dinoflagellates, with biomass divided nearly evenly between nanoplankton (Hnano, 0-20 mum) and microplankton (Hmicro, 20-200 mum) size classes. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available